Apple launches M6 iMac with faster chip at higher price
Summarised from 2 outlets · Updated 5 Nov, 15:00 · Archive
Apple has released a new iMac with an M6 chip, starting at $1,499, with upgraded processors but an unchanged design since 2021.
Apple has introduced the iMac M6, an updated all-in-one desktop featuring the new M6 chip. The base model costs $1,499, representing a $200 price increase from the previous generation. The M6 chip adds two extra cores to both base and high-end models, with the higher-end version offering a 12-core CPU and 12-core GPU rather than 10 cores. Memory bandwidth also increases to 170GB/s from the previous 120GB/s.
All models start with 16GB of RAM and 256GB of storage, with options for higher configurations, four Thunderbolt 4 ports, and additional features like nano-texture glass and Ethernet. The iMac comes in seven colour options with a keyboard and mouse or trackpad included.
Reviewers disagreed on its value. Engadget argues the unchanged design since 2021 feels stale and that the 24-inch display is undersized compared to current norms of 27- and 32-inch monitors, suggesting buyers would be better served by a Mac mini paired with a larger external display. TechRadar, however, contends it remains the best all-in-one desktop available, praising its modern build, colourful design and suitability for family, business and creative work.
How it is being reported
- I've tested Apple's new M6 iMac, and it's still the best all-in-one desktop you can buyI spent five days testing Apple's new M6 iMac to see how its performance upgrades and familiar colorful design stack up as an all-in-one desktop.TechRadar · 5 Nov, 14:30
- Apple iMac M6 review: Faster, more expensive and deeply in need of a refreshMost buyers would be better off with a Mac mini and a bigger external display.Engadget · 5 Nov, 14:00
In this story: Apple · Mac mini · Mac Studio
This summary was written by AI from the headlines and standfirsts above, and states as fact only what at least two outlets report. How we use AI · Report a problem · Corrections log
Comments (0)