news.today
Hello · Register today | LoginHello · My Account[—] [33]
UK

Supreme Court hears appeal against Palestine Action ban

Summarised from 5 outlets · 6 reports · Updated 4 Nov, 17:22 · Archive

The UK Supreme Court is hearing an appeal against the government's decision to ban Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation.

The UK Supreme Court began hearing an appeal on Wednesday against the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation. Huda Ammori, co-founder of the direct action group, is seeking to overturn the ban imposed in July last year.

Palestine Action describes itself as a direct action movement committed to ending global participation in what it characterises as Israel's genocidal and apartheid regime. The proscription places it on the same list as armed groups including al-Qaeda, ISIL and Boko Haram. Those found guilty of belonging to or supporting the organisation could face up to 14 years in prison.

About 25 protesters gathered outside the Supreme Court in central London as the hearing began, with police arresting demonstrators on suspicion of supporting a proscribed organisation under the Terrorism Act. Footage showed officers carrying several people away into police vans. Actor Alfred Enoch attended and held a placard reading 'this is democracy not terrorism'.

On the first day of the two-day hearing, Raza Husain KC, representing Ammori, told the five judges that Palestine Action never advocated for violence against people and that its tactics were similar to or less extreme than those used by the suffragettes and anti-war and environmental groups. He told the court that the suffragettes used arson and bombing attacks but were not proscribed and are now venerated as being on the right side of history.

Husain argued that the ban had affected the entire Palestinian solidarity movement regardless of any connection with Palestine Action and had chilled expression among journalists, academics and artists. Ammori has argued that proscription represents a disproportionate interference with rights to freedom of speech and protest. According to reporting, Palestine Action was the first of 98 proscribed groups banned solely for causing serious property damage rather than advocating violence against people.

Rights groups including Amnesty International and Liberty have opposed the proscription, describing it as a misuse of terrorism powers. Euronews reported that more than 4,000 arrests have been made under the ban, including 325 outside the US embassy on 31 October, with charges linked to the prohibition potentially affected if the appeal succeeds.

In written submissions for the Home Secretary, Sir James Eadie KC said the Court of Appeal's decision against which Ammori is appealing was lawful and proportionate. The Supreme Court hearing continues.

Supreme Court hears appeal against Palestine Action ban
Image: Evening Standard

Comments (0)

How it is being reported

In this story: Huda Ammori · Palestine Action · UK Supreme Court · Raza Husain · James Eadie · Alfred Enoch · Sarah Helm

This summary was written by AI from the headlines and standfirsts above, and states as fact only what at least two outlets report. How we use AI · Report a problem · Corrections log