news.today
Hello · Register today | LoginHello · My Account[—] [32]
Business

At-home vitamin D tests found unreliable by Which?

Summarised from 2 outlets · Updated 30 Oct, 00:27 · Archive

Which? found significant variation in at-home vitamin D test results compared with laboratory blood tests.

Which? has warned that at-home vitamin D tests are returning unreliable results. The watchdog bought five widely available rapid vitamin D tests, each costing around £8, and tested results from the same person against a Care Quality Commission registered laboratory blood test taken on the same day. The laboratory test showed vitamin D levels within the sufficient range.

Rapid tests use a cut-off of 75 nmol/L to indicate sufficient levels, compared with 50 nmol/L for standard NHS blood tests, meaning more people will be flagged as insufficient on home tests. In Which?'s test, the five rapid kits returned conflicting results: only two suggested insufficient levels, two indicated deficient levels significantly lower than the laboratory reading, and one showed sufficient levels. This variation across the same sample highlights the inconsistency of home testing kits.

Which? warned that inaccurate results could leave consumers unnecessarily worried about their health, falsely reassured, or spending money on high-dose supplements they do not need, potentially putting their health at risk. Vitamin D deficiency is common in the UK, particularly during winter months when sunlight is limited, although diet and age also play a role.

At-home vitamin D tests found unreliable by Which?
Image: Evening Standard

Comments (0)

How it is being reported

In this story: Which? · Care Quality Commission · UK · NHS

This summary was written by AI from the headlines and standfirsts above, and states as fact only what at least two outlets report. How we use AI · Report a problem · Corrections log