Babergh Council rejects seven new Traveller pitches in Suffolk
Summarised from 2 outlets · Updated 28 Oct, 17:15 · Archive
Babergh Council has rejected plans to create seven additional pitches for Gypsies and Travellers at an existing site in Monks Eleigh, Suffolk.
Babergh Council has rejected plans for seven additional pitches for the Gypsy and Traveller community at an existing site in Monks Eleigh, Suffolk. The application, submitted by Ruston Planning on behalf of the applicant, proposed the pitches alongside a communal dayroom, associated hardstanding and a redesign of the permitted site layout.
The council's planning officers had advised approval, but the application faced opposition from Monks Eleigh Parish Council and Amy Veitch, a resident next to the site. Councillors cited issues including scale, parking, access and heritage harm to the neighbouring Grade II listed Wagger Farm. The application was rejected by nine votes to two.
Bryn Hurren, the area's district councillor, said: 'The overall impact on the existing community of Monks Eleigh I think will be huge make no mistake about it.' Babergh is currently under its quota of allocated space for Gypsies and Travellers, but the application would have taken the council beyond that figure. Cllr Mary McLaren of Stour said she was 'appalled' by the provisions for the Gypsy and Traveller community, saying the council 'should be doing more'.
How it is being reported
- New Traveller pitches rejected in Suffolk village after warning of 'huge' impactBabergh Council has rejected plans for additional pitches for the Gypsy and Traveller community at an existing Monks Eleigh, Suffolk site.Ipswich Star · 28 Oct, 15:00
- New Traveller pitches rejected in Suffolk village after warning of 'huge' impactBabergh Council has rejected plans for additional pitches for the Gypsy and Traveller community at an existing Monks Eleigh, Suffolk site.East Anglian Daily Times · 28 Oct, 15:00
In this story: Babergh Council · Monks Eleigh · Suffolk · Bryn Hurren · Amy Veitch · Mary McLaren
This summary was written by AI from the headlines and standfirsts above, and states as fact only what at least two outlets report. How we use AI · Report a problem · Corrections log
Comments (0)